chore: fix typo in comment

[criciss]

Overview

fix typo in comment

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Minor internal improvements

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 1b44312a-c85a-4fed-a361-937d1f81043e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 59ed284 and 9057385.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• block/components.go

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR corrects a single-line inline comment in block/components.go that misdescribes the config.Node.BasedSequencer case. The comment text is changed from "bases sequencer" to "based sequencer" with no changes to functional logic or control flow.

Changes

Comment Fix

Layer / File(s)	Summary
BasedSequencer comment correction block/components.go	The inline comment at line 289 is corrected from "bases sequencer" to "based sequencer" to match the actual configuration case being handled.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Possibly related PRs

• evstack/ev-node#3304: Both PRs correct minor inline comment typos without changing any logic or control flow.

Suggested reviewers

• julienrbrt

Poem

A typo in prose, now fixed with care,
"Bases" → "based," we mend the air,
One line, one word, but still worth the fix,
Comments that shine are our clever mix! 🐰✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The PR description is largely incomplete; it contains only the template boilerplate and a minimal one-line summary ('fix typo in comment') without substantive explanation.	Add a detailed overview section explaining the change, including which comment was corrected, what the typo was (e.g., 'bases sequencer' → 'based sequencer'), and why this change improves code clarity.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'chore: fix typo in comment' directly and accurately reflects the main change—correcting a typo in a comment in block/components.go.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 60.69%. Comparing base (59ed284) to head (9057385).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
block/components.go	0.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3334      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.71%   60.69%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         127      127              
  Lines       13781    13781              
==========================================
- Hits         8367     8365       -2     
- Misses       4500     4502       +2     
  Partials      914      914              

Flag	Coverage Δ
combined	60.69% <0.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.